Monday, September 21st, 2009
NYC CAN RALLY TOPS 80,000 SIGNERS DEMANDING 9/11 INQUIRY
: Play in new window
| Play on iPhone / Download Movie
Van Jones will not be speaking at the March For Answers rally
Sunday Sept 27th in support of a NYC petition drive to place
a referendum on the Nov ballot to investigate 9/11.
In this five minute BetterBadNews satire Van Jones explains how the anti war movement and an independent investigation into the events of 9/11 are linked.
Why do so many opposition parties and progressive thought leaders funded by the Rockerfeller and Ford Foundation talk softly and carry small sticks? Is it greed, incompetance or treason?
The BetterBadNews panel also examine an initiative to establish a National Museum of Hidden History proposed by John Judge.
Manny Badillo, Van Jones, Daniel Sunjata and petition drive supporters David Ray Griffin, Willy Nelson, Emenem, Mos Def, Margaret Cho, David Lynch, Cynthia McKinney, Martin and Charlie Sheen and a growing list of notables supporting the March For Answers rally invite your participation. 9/11 Truth for Peace.
Category:� News & Politics
Tags:�van jones manny badillo,van jones,daniel,sunjata,ballot,referendum,� petition,drive,david ray griffin,willy nelson,emenem,mos def,� margaret cho,david lynch,cynthia mcKinney,martin sheen,charlie sheen,9/11truth for peace,betterbadnews,berkeley kid,�james rucker,color of change,
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009
IMPROBABLE SUICIDE CLOSES FBI INVESTIGATION
Weaponized anthrax spores mailed to two congressmen and several members of the news media in September 2001 included hand lettered notes with the salutation, “ALLAH IS GREAT”.
But according to a New York Times investigation, the FBI now believes that the crime was committed by a military lab employee named, Bruce Ivins, who is alleged to have committed suicide before being indicted for murder.
Many colleagues of Ivins have come to his defense, however, pointing out that Bruce Ivins did not possess the skills and equipment required to weaponize anthrax spores.
Ivins denied any involvement in the crime before his alleged suicide in 2008 but the FBI and the New York Times appear satisfied that the case is finally closed.
Additional evidence pointing to a false muslim attack include an intact passport belonging to one of the alleged hijackers that was found in the rubble at ground zero and the infamous “box cutter” myth introduced by CNN’s Brian Ross in the hours following the 911 attacks. According to Brian Ross, Barbara Olsen managed to call her husband Ted from flt 77 shortly before the plane crashed into the Pentagon. Barbara Olsen’s suppossed telephone call was treated by investigators as a credible eyewitness account widely and repeatedly used to advance the myth that the alleged hijackers were armed with card board cutters.
But, according to telephone and billing records submitted by the FBI to a federal court in 2004, Barbara Olsen did not established telephone contact from flt 77 with anyone.
The FBI position is in awkward agreement with research reported by author David Ray Griffin who has pointed out in numerous articles and books that no credible evidence linking arab muslims to any of the September 2001 attacks has ever been produced by government officials investigating the attacks.
Bruce Ivins improbable suicide effectively shuts down any further inquiry into how and where the anthrax was weaponized which would constitute a violation of a US treaty outlawing the weaponization of bio toxins as a war crime.
More importantly, the New York Times account into the anthrax attacks ignores at least two disturbing facts uncovered by their investigation that deserve banner headlines :
FBI ADMITS FALSE MUSLIM ATTACK WAS INSIDE JOB.
ANTHRAX INVESTIGATION REVEALS OUTLAWED BIO WEAPONS PROGRAM.
Friday, November 7th, 2008
THOUGHT CRIMES ARE BACK
On October 13 2008 Naomi Wolf and Daniel Ellsberg seasoned the public discourse with a disturbing narrative about the shift to fascism and the end of democracy in the United States but with no mention of the Big Lie. Daniel Ellsberg went so far as to offer unsupported assertions that muslims attacked the United States on 9/11 and that Osama Bin Laden could do it again. Wolf proclaimed her faith in god and Ellsberg invited the audience to imagine what would happen if a certain muslim leader were to launch another 9/11? Another?
Daniel Ellsberg is an esteemed former intelligence analyst and RAND Corporation thinker who was trained in the study of complex data sets and information. The data David Ray Griffin, Peter Dale Scott, and Steven Jones have provided on this subject is ignored.
Ellsberg was an eyewitness to the Gulf of Tonkin false flag attacks blamed on North Vietnam in the 1960’s. If he thinks it is important to wake people up to how “another” attack might happen he could have said, “…think what will happen if the Pentagon decides to accommodate the administration with another Gulf of Tonkin”.
BetterBadNews examines the Big Lie, info ops and a recent discourse in Berkeley with Naomi Wolf and Daniel Ellsberg that Noam Chomsky would have enjoyed. File under: Left Gatekeepers – Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Closing Down an Open Society Except the Simple Math Of Falling Objects and the Big Lie.
